🛡️ Emfirge
Git branch for your cloud.
Give your AI a read-only map of AWS. Trace attack paths, test a security fix on a cloned graph, and see the result before touching production.
Your scanner finds problems. Emfirge tests the fix.
Most cloud tools hand you a list and ask you to trust the recommendation. Emfirge builds a connected graph of your account, forks it in memory, applies the proposed security change, re-runs the rules, and shows what got safer—or riskier.
| 🕸️ See the path | 🎯 Find the chokepoint | 🧪 Rehearse the fix | 💬 Stay in your AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internet → compute → IAM → data | Prioritize what breaks the most attack paths | No write access. No production mutation. | Claude, Cursor, Kiro, Cline, Continue, Codex |
~20 AWS service types · 58 graph-aware rules · 17 rule families · 7 MCP tools
Start in 30 seconds
npx @emfirge/mcp install
Then ask your assistant:
Scan my AWS account using role
arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/EmfirgeReadOnly in us-east-1
No role yet? Say “help me set up Emfirge.” You will get a one-click CloudFormation link for a read-only IAM role.
Try it now with no setup: use demo role
arn:aws:iam::194722410583:role/EmfirgeReadOnlyinus-east-1.
Free: 5 scans per AWS account per day. No signup. No API key.
Ask questions your cloud can finally answer
Show me the worst attack path from the internet.
What is the blast radius if this instance is compromised?
Which resource should I fix first?
Will closing SSH remove the path without adding new security findings?
Check this account against CIS AWS Foundations 1.5.
One graph. Seven tools.
| Tool | Answer |
|---|---|
emfirge_scan | What does my AWS risk look like? |
emfirge_get_findings | What is wrong and how do I fix it? |
emfirge_attack_paths | How could an attacker reach my data? |
emfirge_verify_fix | What changes if I apply this security fix? |
emfirge_simulate_breach | What happens after this resource is compromised? |
emfirge_check_compliance | Which CIS AWS 1.5 or SOC 2 controls fail? |
emfirge_setup_help | How do I create the read-only role? |
Proof, not a prompt
Scan AWS → build graph → fork graph → apply mutation → re-run rules → show delta
The score, findings, attack paths, and fix verification come from deterministic graph analysis—not an LLM guessing what might happen. Your AI explains the evidence; Emfirge produces it.
Built for trust
- Read-only AWS access through a role you own and can revoke anytime.
- One-hour STS credentials protected by an ExternalId and never stored.
- Local tokenization of recognized AWS identifiers before MCP results reach your LLM in strict mode.
- No production changes during scans, breach simulations, or fix verification.
- Source available for the MCP, scanner engine, rules, scoring, and docs.
Emfirge proves the simulated security delta against your latest scan; it does not yet prove application connectivity. Some graph-derived labels may also remain visible in strict mode. See How it works and Privacy for the exact boundaries.
Go deeper when you are ready
Quickstart · How the fork works · MCP tools · Privacy · Security · Self-hosting · Contributing
Stop guessing in production.
Fork the graph. Follow the path. Prove the security delta.