Drive Java desktop apps from an AI agent, through the JVM's own accessibility tree
Runs on your machine from its package; the steps are below.
Not assessed yet.
Odel charges nothing per call. The publisher may charge for its own service.
Runs locally over stdio
This server isn't hosted — your MCP client launches it from a package registry. Use one of the commands below, or drop the config into your client (e.g. Claude Desktop).
Run
uvx pyjab-mcp
MCP client config
{
"mcpServers": {
"pyjab": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"pyjab-mcp"
]
}
}
}An MCP server that lets an AI agent drive Java desktop applications — Swing and AWT — through pyjab, which reads the JVM's own accessibility tree via Java Access Bridge. JavaFX is not supported: it publishes its accessibility through UI Automation rather than Java Access Bridge, so a JavaFX window is not a Java window as far as JAB is concerned (pyjab#227).
mcp-name: io.github.gaozhao1989/pyjab-mcp
It never modifies, restarts or injects into the target application. That constraint is the point: launch parameters, classpaths and dependency JARs stay exactly as they are, which is what makes this usable against a production Java client that you cannot change.
The alternative is to put an agent inside the target JVM. An agent is attached to a JVM
that is already running, or named on the command line with -javaagent when the application
starts, and either way the tool's code sits inside someone else's process — a JVM it did not
launch and does not control. This server does neither: it loads nothing into the application
and reads the accessibility tree through Java Access Bridge from outside it, which is how it
can attach to a process it did not launch.
The dynamic half of that — attaching an agent to a JVM that is already running — is the half
the JDK has a direction on, with no release date attached.
JEP 451 shipped in JDK 21 as the preparation stage: loading an
agent into an already-running JVM now warns. The JEP states its aim as "prepare users for a
future release which disallows the dynamic loading of agents by default", a release that has
not been named; its own non-goals leave agents named with -javaagent at startup, and any use
of the Attach API that is not loading an agent, outside that direction.
Released on PyPI — 16 tools: java_diagnostics, java_list_windows,
java_attach_window, java_snapshot, java_find, java_get_element, java_get_text,
java_get_table, java_click, java_set_text, java_select, java_fill_form,
java_send_keys, java_focus_window, java_wait_for, and java_screenshot. It needs
pyjab>=1.11.0: 1.9.0 brought the tree walk a snapshot is built on, 1.10.0 brought the public
window listing and JABDriver.detach(), which releases a driver's binding without terminating
the process — this server has no tool that releases a session, so a binding lasts for the life
of the process — and 1.11.0 brought JABDriver.send_keys, so java_send_keys sends a real
chord, and JABDriver.focus(), so java_focus_window can bring a window forward.
java_send_keys sends a chord to whichever window has the keyboard focus, and attaching does
not give a window focus (pyjab#180).
java_focus_window is the missing half: it brings the window forward and, because asked for
focus and got focus are different facts, it reports whether the window actually came
forward rather than assuming it did. It probes for the API rather than assuming it, so an
install below the pin is told which release has it instead of failing with an AttributeError.
Two elements can share a name, which is why a handle carries where an element is as well as what it is called: searching by name returns every match, each gets its own handle, and the end-to-end suite checks that clicking one acts on that one and not the other.
Nothing is acted on until it has been checked. Every action re-finds the element and compares role, name, position among siblings and bounds against what the snapshot recorded, then acts on the element it just checked — and if anything differs, it does nothing and reports the difference.
java_get_table is where this substrate earns its place: it reads a JTable through the
JVM's own AccessibleTable interface — row and column counts, then cell text, a page of rows
at a time — rather than through a platform bridge that does not carry that information at all.
Live behaviour is verified on a hosted Windows runner by windows-gui.yml: the end-to-end
suite attaches to a real Swing application, snapshots it, resolves a handle against the real
element, and checks that a window opened after the bridge had been idle is still seen. That
last one is the reason the layer exists — a message pump on the wrong thread passes every
other test in this repository. What it still cannot cover is your application: the run drives
pyjab's test app, and the one that matters is the one you care about.
It needs pyjab>=1.11.0, which brought the APIs this project spent M1 and M2 waiting on:
list_java_windows(), so the window list comes from the bridge directly rather than through
pyjab's CLI; JABDriver.detach(), so a bound driver can be released without terminating the
application — the only teardown before it killed the bound process; and, in 1.11.0,
JABDriver.send_keys(), so java_send_keys sends a real chord, and JABDriver.focus(), which
java_focus_window uses to bring a window forward and report whether it came forward. That
return value is why the tool exists at all: what a caller needs to know before sending a chord
is where the keyboard focus actually is, not that focus was requested.
A handle from java_snapshot is a position, not a reference. A later call re-finds the
element and checks its role, name, position and bounds before doing anything, so a window
that moved on produces a message rather than an action on the wrong control.
The one thing that was already settled is the question the whole direction rested on.
Measured on a real Java window, through the same UIAutomationCore that generic Windows
automation uses:
| elements | named | depth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| generic UI Automation, the Java window | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| pyjab, the same window | 601 | 513 | 12 |
| control: UI Automation, the whole desktop | 147 | 99 | finished |
The control is what makes the six mean anything: the same measurement over the whole desktop finishes, so the measurement works and the Java window is the hard case.
| file | what |
|---|---|
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | how the server is put together, the constraints that shape it, and what each guard enforces |
docs/CLIENTS.md | connecting Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code |
docs/RELEASING.md | how a release happens, and what has to exist before one |
CHANGELOG.md | what changed, and why |
Maintainer working notes are kept out of this repository deliberately. Everything a user or a
contributor needs is above, and the rules that are not prose are enforced by the guards in
tools/ — which run in CI on every push.
"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\jabswitch" -enable, then
restart the Java application — for the application being drivenpyjab, which brings the restpip install pyjab-mcp
Working on the server itself is pip install -e ".[dev]" — see Working on it.
v0.1.0–v0.1.2 predate the bundle and carry no assets; every release cut since carries one. It is
pyjab-mcp-<version>.mcpb — the built wheel and its dependency closure, installed together into
one tree per supported CPython minor, plus one entry script, in a single file. Each tree carries
the package itself, so the file holds one copy of pyjab_mcp per minor rather than one wheel
beside the trees. Download it from the
releases page and hand it to the client:
Claude Desktop installs a .mcpb by opening it, and docs/CLIENTS.md has the
details.
The bundle changes none of the requirements above, and it narrows one of them to the
interpreters it actually carries. It bundles no Python interpreter and no JDK: this server
drives Java Access Bridge, so 64-bit Windows, 64-bit CPython 3.10-3.13, and a JDK with Java
Access Bridge enabled are still what the machine has to provide — and the Java application it
drives still has to be running before you attach to it. That range is narrower than pip install, which has no upper bound, and it is not a detail: the bundle is tens of megabytes
because it carries one dependency tree per supported minor, since pydantic-core, cffi,
rpds-py, cryptography and pywin32 ship compiled wheels tagged for one minor each. Started
on any other interpreter it stops with a sentence naming the interpreter it found and the ones
the file carries, rather than an ImportError from a native module.
The interpreter has to be the python on PATH. The manifest declares no user_config
fallback, so the client runs whatever python resolves to there — and a machine with CPython
installed but not on PATH gets a client that shows no tools, with nothing in it that names the
cause: no interpreter ever starts, so the bundle's own refusal cannot run. where.exe python
prints the interpreter that will be used; if it prints nothing, put the installation's directory
on PATH.
MCPB enforces no permissions. There is no manifest-level sandbox — a bundled server runs
with the full privileges of the user who installed it, exactly as it would if you had started
it by hand. Read the source before installing a .mcpb from anyone, this one included.
The console script the package installs:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pyjab-mcp": { "command": "python", "args": ["-m", "pyjab_mcp"] }
}
}
Claude Desktop reads %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json, and takes this (double
the backslashes — JSON needs it):
{
"mcpServers": {
"pyjab-mcp": { "command": "C:\\Users\\you\\.venv\\Scripts\\pyjab-mcp.exe", "args": [] }
}
}
Claude Code writes the same entry for you: claude mcp add pyjab-mcp -- pyjab-mcp.
docs/CLIENTS.md has Cursor and VS Code as well, the config file each one reads, the Windows path problem that makes most setups fail, and what to do when a tool answers with an error.
Start with java_diagnostics. It reports which part of the environment is missing —
Java Access Bridge not enabled, no bridge DLL, a 32-bit interpreter against a 64-bit JVM —
instead of leaving a tool call to fail with a locator error.
Java Access Bridge exposes what an application declares about itself: a tree of roles, names, values, states and the actions a control supports. That is what this server drives, and it sets the boundary of what it can reach.
It works on Java applications that expose accessibility — Swing and AWT applications and
applets running as desktop applications. JavaFX is not supported: it publishes its
accessibility through UI Automation rather than Java Access Bridge. Buttons, menus, tables,
trees, lists, text fields and their values are all readable and actionable, and
java_get_table reads a table's cells through the table's own interface rather than the
pixels.
It cannot reach, because the information is not there to read:
| Not supported | Why |
|---|---|
Canvas-drawn interfaces — a JPanel painting its own widgets | There are no accessible children, so there is nothing to find, click or read. java_screenshot will show you a picture, and a picture is not something you can act on. If a panel like this needs to be driven, the application has to expose the controls. Measured, not just expected. pyjab investigated a canvas-painted panel (pyjab#73) and found no accessible children; this repository now has the regression test, against a fixture application that paints a panel and contains no child components (tests/e2e/fixtures/BoundaryApp.java). It asserts the pair: the panel is a leaf with children_count = 0, and a screenshot of the same element returns real PNG bytes — pixels without structure, which is the whole point. It runs in the windows-gui job; pyjab's own test application still has no canvas, which is tracked in pyjab#169. |
| Java inside a browser (an embedded JVM, a Java Web Start descendant) | The browser owns the window and does not publish the applet's Java accessibility tree through JAB. |
| Applets in a plugin host | Same reason: no JAB tree reaches the desktop. |
| Non-Java Windows applications | Nothing here speaks UIA. A UIA-based MCP server is the right tool. |
| Anything pixel-based — reading a screenshot to guess at layout, clicking coordinates | Deliberately out of scope. Guessing at pixels is what this project exists to replace. |
Also worth knowing:
JABDriver.detach() releases the binding and leaves the process running.java_screenshot is for looking; anything you want to
act on has to be found in the tree, because that is where handles and names live.The list above is what the substrate cannot reach. This is the other kind: things this server could do and does not, so that somebody evaluating it against a hosted alternative knows what they would be giving up — and what would have to change to add each one.
| not there | why, and what adding it would take |
|---|---|
| Remote transport (streamable HTTP, SSE) | It speaks MCP over stdio only: a client starts it locally, and it attaches to applications on the same desktop. A remote transport means a Windows host to connect to, an authentication story, and deciding what a second client may do to an application the first one is driving. |
| More than one session at a time | Sessions are cheap and independent (java_attach_window per window), so several windows work today; what is missing is multi-tenant arbitration — who owns an application, what happens when two agents drive it at once. That is a policy, not a feature. |
| An audit log | Nothing here writes a journal of what it did. The transcript the MCP client keeps is the audit trail, and its completeness is the client's business. A server-side log would be an append-only file plus a decision about what it must never contain (window titles and cell values are user data). |
| Batch execution | java_fill_form is the one batch tool, and it is bounded on purpose. A general "run these tool calls in order" would be a scripting language with a security model attached, and the client already has one. |
| CI integration | The end-to-end layer in this repository is the answer for this repository. Driving somebody else's application from their pipeline needs a headless-ish Windows runner with a desktop session — which exists (the windows-gui job uses one) — plus their application installed and JAB-enabled on it. |
Each is a deliberate boundary rather than an unfinished feature, and the ones that are
architectural (transport, multi-tenancy) would change the shape of ServerState rather than sit
beside it.
pyjab-mcp --version and of the java_diagnostics tool: between them they answer most
environmental questions before they are asked.The suite that runs on every push cannot drive an application: it needs Windows, a JDK, a
desktop session and a running Swing app. That layer is tests/e2e/, skipped unless
PYJAB_MCP_E2E=1, and windows-gui.yml runs it on a hosted windows-latest runner — by
hand, or on a weekly schedule. It starts a second JVM after the bridge has been idling,
because a message pump on the wrong thread passes everything else and fails exactly that.
gh workflow run windows-gui.yml -f java=17 # the end-to-end run and the JDK matrix
gh run watch
It is not a status check: nobody runs it unless somebody asks (or the week comes round), so a green default CI run still says nothing about a live window.
Tag-driven: bump src/pyjab_mcp/__init__.py, move the changelog's Unreleased section under
the new version, set server.json, then python tools/check_release_version.py v0.1.0 and tag.
docs/RELEASING.md has the whole procedure, the two one-time setups (a
PyPI pending publisher and the registry namespace), and what the four release jobs do.
python -m pytest tests/ # the portable suite, any platform
python tools/check_pyjab_api_surface.py # every pyjab call is public, released, recorded
python tools/check_documented_surface.py # docs/ARCHITECTURE.md's tool table and the code agree
python tools/check_local_only_files.py # maintainer notes stay unpublished
python tools/check_pyjab_readiness.py # what pyjab still owes this project
python tools/check_pyjab_changelog.py # every marked pyjab change has an answer here
python -m pytest tests/contract/ # the pyjab shapes this project depends on
python -m build && python tools/check_dist_contents.py --dist dist
The guards are the project's rules made mechanical, in the same shape pyjab uses for its own:
a registry of what is allowed, checked in both directions, so adding a call site fails until
somebody writes down why it is acceptable. docs/ARCHITECTURE.md lists them and what each
one enforces.