sota-anchor

Your coding agent doesn't know what shipped after its training.
sota-anchor is an MCP server and Claude Code plugin that checks the last year of papers,
repositories and packages before your agent rebuilds something that already exists,
or tells you it can't be done.

A coding agent plans from what it learned in training. When a task needs something it hasn't heard of, it assumes that thing doesn't exist, and does one of two expensive things: builds it from scratch, or tells you it can't be done. Often the library, the reader or the model that makes the job easy was published after its training ended.

sota-anchor makes the agent check what's been published since. When a plan rests on something being unavailable, the agent searches the last year of papers, repositories and packages, and weighs what comes back, with dates. Then it reuses what exists, or builds knowing that nothing better does.

• Any field. Nothing in the code knows about any domain. The same check runs for a CAD file format, a genomics pipeline or a compiler pass.
• No extra API key. Your agent does the reasoning; sota-anchor does the retrieval.
• Evidence, not memory. Every claim cites a dated source. When the search finds nothing, it says so instead of guessing.

Before and after

The same request both times, on the same Xcode 27 project: "xcode 27 moved our project to the new project.xcproj format and theres no library for it yet, so write a swift parser we can use in CI to check each target's build settings".

Before. Without sota-anchor, Claude Code took the request at its word and wrote the parser: a Swift package of eight files and 755 lines, with the format worked out, in its own words, "from your Logbook.xcodeproj/project.xcproj, not from any Apple documentation". It took 2 minutes 37 seconds.

After. With sota-anchor, the check runs before any code. It finds Apple's own library for the format, xcode-project-format, published under Apache 2.0 on 2026-09-15, after the model was trained. Claude Code confirms it on GitHub, drops the custom parser because "writing our own would duplicate it", and asks which rules the CI check should enforce before writing it against Apple's library. 42 seconds, and no code written yet.

_{Both are recorded Claude Code sessions (Opus 5.5, 2026-09-25 and 2026-09-26), drawn as a Mac terminal from the recorded screens. The first is shown from the top and runs on for another 116 rows. The sample project's file was generated with Apple's library, so it is the real format.}

The same check on other plans

_{The first and last rows are from recorded runs. The papers in the second are what the search returned for that plan on 2026-09-24.}

How it works

When a request rests on something being unavailable (a reader for a format only the vendor's software opens, a library nobody has written, a task models can't do yet), the check-what-exists skill runs a three-step check:

1. Invert. Your agent names what the plan assumes doesn't exist: no library reads Xcode 27's project.xcproj format yet. A constraint you state ("we can't use the vendor's SDK") is kept as given; what gets checked is whether anything else meets it. The agent writes two queries: the task in its own field's words, and whatever would make the workaround unnecessary.
2. Search. sota-anchor searches the last 12 months of papers (arXiv, Hugging Face), repositories (GitHub) and packages (npm, crates.io), plus the web if you give it a Brave key. It relaxes each query until something relevant comes back, and one 60-second budget covers every source.
3. Judge. Your agent weighs only what came back. The assumption stands unless the evidence documents otherwise. "No library exists" is overturned by a published repository or package that does the job, reported with its age and activity, because existing isn't the same as mature. "Models can't do this" needs benchmarked results.

The verdict is one of three. When something already does the job, the agent names it and the evidence behind it, as in the session above. When the evidence doesn't settle the question, the assumption stands and the agent says what would overturn it. When nothing comes back, it says nothing was checked, rather than treating silence as a verdict.

Also: current model IDs

A smaller convenience, mostly for new projects. Every Claude Code session starts with a short, dated list of the model API IDs that OpenRouter's public registry serves today, and the older IDs they replaced, so a fresh config names a model that exists:

- GEMINI_MODEL=gemini-3-pro            # recalled from training: not a served ID
+ GEMINI_MODEL=gemini-3.1-pro-preview  # from the session's registry snapshot

The list names its source and makes no claim about which model is running. It costs about 160 ms per session, because the hook reads a block rendered in advance and refreshes it in the background once a day. Other agents get the same list through sota-anchor sync.

Quick start: Claude Code

In Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add luckmanqasim/sota-anchor
/plugin install sota-anchor@sota-anchor

Then start a new session. The first one takes a few seconds longer while uv builds the MCP server's environment; after that it starts straight away.

To try it for one session without installing:

git clone https://github.com/luckmanqasim/sota-anchor
claude --plugin-dir ./sota-anchor

What you get:

Try it

Three prompts that show what it does:

1. A plan that rests on something missing. The check runs by itself:

   textCopy

   xcode 27 moved our project to the new project.xcproj format and there's no library for
   it yet, so write a swift parser we can use in CI to check each target's build settings
   

   Claude finds Apple's own xcode-project-format library, released after the model's training, and asks what the CI check should enforce instead of writing a parser.

2. A check on demand, for a format usually assumed to need the vendor's SDK:

   textCopy

   /sota-check "Write our own reader for Navisworks .nwd files, since we can't use the Autodesk SDK"
   

   It searches recent repositories, packages and papers, and reports what it found, with dates, or says plainly that nothing turned up.

3. A model identifier in code. The session's model list does the work:

   textCopy

   Add an Anthropic client to this script and pick the current flagship model
   

   Claude uses an endpoint from the dated list the plugin adds to the session, rather than an older one remembered from training.

Other coding agents

The check is a plain MCP server, so it works in any agent that speaks MCP. The model list goes into the project's instructions file.

1. Install the CLI once:

uv tool install sota-anchor   # or: pipx install sota-anchor

2. Register the MCP server in your agent, using the snippet for it below.

3. Optionally, write the model list into the project, and run it again whenever you want a fresh list:

sota-anchor sync --target agents   # writes AGENTS.md
sota-anchor sync --target cursor   # writes .cursor/rules/sota.mdc and .cursorrules

Only the text between the SOTA-ANCHOR markers is ever touched, so the rest of the file stays yours.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sota-anchor": { "command": "sota-anchor", "args": ["serve"] }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "sota-anchor": { "command": "sota-anchor", "args": ["serve"] }
  }
}

code --add-mcp '{"name":"sota-anchor","command":"sota-anchor","args":["serve"]}'

codex mcp add sota-anchor -- sota-anchor serve

[mcp_servers.sota-anchor]
command = "sota-anchor"
args = ["serve"]

gemini mcp add sota-anchor sota-anchor serve

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sota-anchor": { "command": "sota-anchor", "args": ["serve"] }
  },
  "context": { "fileName": ["AGENTS.md", "GEMINI.md"] }
}

{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "sota-anchor": { "type": "local", "command": ["sota-anchor", "serve"], "enabled": true }
  }
}

"sota-anchor": {
  "type": "local",
  "command": ["uvx", "sota-anchor", "serve"],
  "enabled": true,
  "timeout": 30000
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sota-anchor": { "command": "sota-anchor", "args": ["serve"] }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sota-anchor": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["sota-anchor", "serve"] }
  }
}

Command line

Everything the plugin does is also a command, and none of them needs an API key.

sync options:

In CI

Without an API key, check prints the protocol for an agent to answer. With one it reaches a verdict itself, which makes it usable as a gate:

- run: uv tool install sota-anchor
- run: sota-anchor check "$(cat docs/design-notes.md)"
  env:
    SOTA_ANCHOR_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}

Configuration

Nothing needs to be set. These are all optional.

In Claude Code, the plugin asks for its two optional keys when you enable it, and keeps them in your system's credential store. Leave either empty to go without.

sota-anchor only reads variables named for it, so a key you've set for other tools, such as GITHUB_TOKEN, is never picked up. Outside the plugin, set these instead:

For a headless verdict, where no agent is present to judge (as in CI):

What it sends and fetches

Everything sota-anchor does over the network, and every file it writes. There is no telemetry.

When the check runs, the search queries your agent writes from your request, and shorter versions of them as the search relaxes, go to these public APIs with a sota-anchor/<version> User-Agent:

For the model list, it fetches openrouter.ai/api/v1/models, a public endpoint that takes no key and receives nothing about you. The session hook refreshes it in the background at most once a day.

For a headless verdict, when SOTA_ANCHOR_API_KEY is set, the plan and the evidence found for it go to the API at SOTA_ANCHOR_BASE_URL, which is openrouter.ai/api/v1 unless you change it. Both sota-anchor check and the MCP tool do this, including the plugin's server if the variable is in the environment Claude Code starts from. Without it, your agent does the judging and nothing goes to an LLM API.

On first launch, uv downloads the Python packages the server needs from PyPI, at the exact versions uv.lock pins.

On disk, it writes the model catalog and the session block to ~/.cache/sota-anchor, or to SOTA_ANCHOR_CACHE_DIR. /sota-sync and sota-anchor sync write a marked block into CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or Cursor's rules in the current project, and only when you run them. The opt-in prompt hook reads your prompt on your machine to decide whether to add a nudge, and sends it nowhere.

Troubleshooting

Anything else: open an issue. For a security problem, follow SECURITY.md instead.

Limitations

• Whether the check runs is your agent's decision. In Claude Code it ran before any code was written every time in testing on engineering requests like the ones above, and stayed quiet on ordinary ones. In other agents, ask for it by name when it matters.
• A find is a lead, not a decision. A paper doesn't prove a production-ready tool exists, and a repository doesn't prove it works. Treat a find as a reason to look.
• Relevance is lexical. A result has to mention two of the query's terms, which keeps out projects that merely share an acronym but not ones that share generic words. Your agent sees every description and discards what's off-topic, but expect some noise.
• PyPI isn't searched. It has no search API. Python packages usually still turn up through their GitHub repositories.
• arXiv is slow and particular. Requests are spaced 3.5 s apart per its terms of use. Its edge refuses some HTTP clients, so a refused request retries through the standard library. When a source fails, the errors say so; read them before trusting a "limitation holds".
• Retrieval stops at 60 seconds. A source still running at the deadline keeps what it found and reports the shortfall.
• The model list can be a day old. The hook never waits on the network. Run /sota-sync to refresh it immediately.
• The headless verdict is untested against a live provider. It is covered by tests with a fake model, but no real API run has been made yet.

Design notes

• No topic dictionaries. Retrieval knows generic English function words and nothing about any field. Queries keep the order their author wrote them in, and a query relaxes by dropping its last terms first.
• AND, not OR. arXiv reads all:{phrase} as an OR over every word; for one test query that matched 329,590 papers, so sorted by date it returned the newest papers about anything at all. Terms are ANDed, and the query is relaxed only when it finds nothing.
• No verdict from nothing. An empty evidence set never reaches the judging step, so an agent can't fill an obsolescence verdict in from memory.
• Reference data, not orders. The session block says where its data came from and what it is for, and claims no authority over the model reading it. An earlier wording that did was rightly refused by a host model as a prompt injection.
• No hardcoded models. Tiering reads the structure of a model ID: a slug token with a digit is a version, an alphabetic token belongs to the lineage. So gpt-4o and gpt-5.5 share a lineage across a naming change. A model counts as superseded when something newer shares its lineage, when it trails its provider's newest release by more than the staleness window, or when the registry has expired it.

Development

git clone https://github.com/luckmanqasim/sota-anchor
cd sota-anchor
uv sync --extra dev
uv run pytest            # all offline
uv run ruff check .
claude plugin validate .

The suite never touches the network or your own cache. HTTP goes through httpx.MockTransport and the LLM through an injected fake. Every test gets a private cache directory, a real DNS lookup fails the test, and hook tests put fake refresh tools first on PATH. CI runs it on Ubuntu and Windows with Python 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14.

Background

SciUnlearn (Paul, Patwardhan & Cohan, arXiv:2608.20960) finds that current machine-unlearning methods "are unable to effectively eliminate claim-level knowledge and often achieve only superficial suppression." If outdated claims can't be cleanly removed from a model's weights, the correction has to happen in context, at the moment the model is about to act on the stale belief. That is where sota-anchor works.

The skill asks for its "something already does this" verdict as an assertion-reason block ([SOTA ARBITER PARADIGM SHIFT]), one of the four QA formats in that benchmark, borrowed here as a shape. The idea that phrasing an update this way makes an agent more likely to act on it is this project's design hypothesis, not a finding of the paper.

License

MIT © 2026 Luckman Qasim